Edry v. Adelman

Memorandum Opinion. In this case we must decide whether the trial court abused its discretion by excluding plaintiffs expert’s testimony under MRE 702 and whether the trial court erred by dismissing plaintiffs entire complaint. We affirm the Court of Appeals judgment that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by barring the expert’s testimony as unreliable and did not err by dismissing plaintiffs entire complaint.1

In June 2003, plaintiff noticed an approximately three-millimeter lump under her arm. Before noticing the lump, plaintiff had been seeing defendant,2 an obstetrician and…