Legal Opinion
Burks v. City of Philadelphia
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 26, 1995No. Civ. A. 95-1636PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BECHTLE, District Judge:
Presently before the court is City of Philadelphia (“City”) and Richard Scott’s (“Scott”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings for Portions of the Plaintiffs’ Complaint pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(c). For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ motion will be denied.
I. BACKGROUND
The parties generally agree on the following facts. The AIDS Activity Coordinating Office (“AACO”), part of the City’s Department of Health, receives federal funds to coordinate AIDS prevention activities in Philadelphia. AACO distributes the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Roger Turbe v. Government of the Virgin Islands, Virgin Islands Water and Power AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Colburn v. Upper Darby TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- El Ameen Bey v. StumpfDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
- Douris v. DoughertyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
- RTC Mortgage Trust 1994 N-1 v. Fidelity National Title InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Mendez v. DrahamDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- Untracht v. FikriDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.