Marean v. Stanley
Colorado Court of Appeals
Error to the District Court of Arapahoe County.
1Opinion of the CourtReed, J.
One J. H. Rigden, in the month of March, 1890, was building for himself two different sets of tenements in North Denver. Stanley, defendant in error (plaintiff below), was by Rigden employed to do the plumbing in the houses. No contract as to price was made. It appears that defendant had previously been quite extensively employed by Rigden on other buildings, and was required by him to do the work at what it should be worth. One set of buildings was known as the “ Caithness Ave. Property; ” the other, as the “ Douglas St. Property.” The work upon Caithness Ave. property was commenced May 2d.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Crawford v. CrockettIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- West v. FlemmingIllinois Supreme Court · 1857
- Germania Building & Loan Ass'n v. WagnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- McNiel v. BorlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Webb v. Van ZandtNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1863
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hatcher v. Hendrie & Bolthoff Mfg. & Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Hayutin v. GibbonsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
- Fowler & Peth, Inc. v. ReganSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- State Bank v. PlummerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
- Benbow v. James JohnsOregon Supreme Court · 1910
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.