Legal Opinion
Carlisle v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided June 11, 1894No. 16851PublishedCited by 13 opinions
The Reporters’ statement of tbe case: The grounds of the motion are set forth in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
RicnAEDSON, Oh. J.,
delivered the opinion of the court:
The defendants move to dismiss the petition, in accordance with a rule of the court, on the ground that it appears upon the face of the pleadings that the claim sued upon first accrued more than six years preceding the date on which the petition was filed, and that it is therefore forever barred under the following provisions of the Revised Statutes:
“Sec. 1009. Every claim against the United States, cognizable by the Court of Claims, shall be forever barred unless the petition setting forth a statement thereof is filed in the court, or…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kendall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- United States v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Battelle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1871
- Clyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Green v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1881
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
- Nager Electric Company, Inc. And Keystone Engineering Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Frank E. Lipp v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
- Lipp v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
- Howard University v. CassellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.