Annex Books, Incorporated v. City of Indianapolis
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.
The Supreme Court has held that state and local governments may regulate adult establishments by using time, place, and manner restrictions to reduce the secondary effects of those businesses on third parties, but may not regulate them to restrict the dissemination of speech disapproved by local residents. Los Angeles v. Alameda Books, Inc., 535 U.S. 425, 122 S.Ct. 1728, 152 L.Ed.2d 670 (2002); Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc., 475 U.S. 41, 106 S.Ct. 925, 89 L.Ed.2d 29 (1986); see also, e.g., Illinois One News, Inc. v. Marshall, 477 F.3d 461, 463 (7th Cir.2007).
Indi…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- City of Los Angeles v. Alameda Books, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Maages Auditorium v. Prince George's CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- HH-Indianapolis LLC v. Consolidated City of Indianapolis/Marion CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2017
- Assoc of Club Exct v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023