Legal Opinion

In Re Jones

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1998No. 97-0501PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

The sole issue in this original mandamus proceeding is whether relator gave the notice required by former Rule 40(a)(3)(B), Tex. R.App. P., of her inability to give security for costs to perfect her appeal. We conclude she did.

Rule 40(a)(3)(B) required an appellant to give notice to the opposing party or the party’s attorney and to the court reporter within two days after filing an affidavit averring inability to give security for costs of appeal. Harvella Jones filed an affidavit of indigency to perfect appeal of an adverse judgment in her action against Donald Jecker. The same day she…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hanks v. RosserTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. Christy Jean Wand LaCokeTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. McRoberts v. RyalsTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Jones v. StaymanTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Mr. Penguin Tuxedo Rental & Sales, Inc. v. NCR Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re ArroyoTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. Ayala, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1998
  3. Ex Parte Yates, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  4. State v. Anderson, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  5. Ex Parte Richards, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API