Legal Opinion

Parrott v. ORLOVA

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 23, 2011No. 063623; A137562PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs appeal from a general judgment dismissing their claim against defendant for enforcement of a restrictive covenant and a supplemental judgment awarding defendant attorney fees under ORS 20.105(1). Defendant cross-appeals from the supplemental judgment, arguing that the trial court erred by not awarding her the full amount of attorney fees requested. We affirm the dismissal without discussion and write only to address the attorney fee issue. Our reversal of the attorney fee award renders defendant’s cross-appeal moot.

Plaintiffs’ complaint alleged that defendant constructed her home…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mulier v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In re the Marriage of PageCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. Nguyen v. McGrawCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. DRY CLEANING TO-YOUR-DOOR, INC.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. Bridgestar Capital Corp. v. NguyenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. Wedemeyer v. Nike Ihm, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  4. Albrecht v. EmmertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API