Legal Opinion

State v. McCormick

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 4, 1979No. 54PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPELAND, Justice.

In his fifth assignment of error, defendant contends that the trial judge committed prejudicial error in improperly restricting the testimony of a defense witness as to the reputation of the prosecutrix, Beatrice Bethea. We agree; therefore, the defendant’s conviction must be reversed.

The applicable law in this State provides that an impeaching character witness, who knows the general reputation and character of the witness about which he plans to testify, may state the reputation of the witness “categorically, i.e., simply saying that it is good or bad, without more, or he…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Delaware Republican State Committee v. RedfearnSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. State v. . EflerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  3. State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. McEachernSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. State v. HairstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. MontagueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. SquireSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  4. State v. RodriguezNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. LongCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API