Legal Opinion

Miller v. Fulop

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 5, 1989No. A8711-07257; CA A49423Published

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment awarding plaintiff $48,000 and dismissing his counterclaim with prejudice. We affirm.

Plaintiff sought a judgment on a promissory note that had been executed by defendant in favor of plaintiff during the parties’ marriage, and which had been awarded to plaintiff as a part of the property settlement in the parties’ 1985 dissolution. Defendant’s counterclaim alleged that plaintiff had not complied with the terms of the dissolution judgment and, as a result, defendant had been damaged in an amount exceeding the amount of the note. The trial court dismissed the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of RousseauCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. In re the Marriage of MurrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. State ex rel. Fitzgerald v. FitzgeraldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. Abraham v. GoffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API