Foltz v. Hardin
Illinois Supreme Court
Writ of Error to the Circuit Court of Knox county; the Hon. Arthur A. Smith, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam :
This was an action of assumpsit, brought by Milton B. Hardin, against F. P. Foltz and others, to recover a balance claimed to be due on a promissory note, which was as follows:
■“$4200.00. Abingdon, III., March 17, 1886.
“Nine months after date, we, or either of us, promise to pay to M. B. Hardin and S. Givens, administrators of the estate of Jacob Young, forty-two hundred and no-100 dollars, value received, with 7% interest after date.
(Signed) Union Bank of Abingdon,
per Strawther Givens, Prest.,
S. McFarland,
J. H. & W. 0. Gadwallader,
F. P. Foltz.”
The note was endorsed by the payees…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Union Trust Co. v. RigdonIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
- McFadden v. FortierIllinois Supreme Court · 1858
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cottrell v. GersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1938
- MacLachlan v. PeaseIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- City of Plankinton v. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
- Youngquist v. HunterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1922
- Miller v. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.