Legal Opinion

Thirteen South Ltd. v. Summit Village, Inc.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1993No. 23585PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant Thirteen South, Inc. (“Thirteen South”) argues that its purchase of a lot in a tax foreclosure sale extinguished real covenants burdening the lot. It brought this action against Summit Village, Inc., a neighborhood homeowners’ association (“the Association”), seeking to invalidate covenánts, including a covenant requiring the owner of the lot to pay dues to sustain neighborhood facilities and services. In a motion for preliminary injunction, Thirteen South asked the district court to enjoin the Association from selling the lot to satisfy a private lien for delinquent payments…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tax Lien Co. v. . SchultzeNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Hayes v. GibbsUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Dixon v. ThatcherNevada Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Alamogordo Improvement Co. v. PrendergastNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Northwestern Improvement Co. v. LowryMontana Supreme Court · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Massey v. GriffithsUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Buchholz v. Waterville Estates Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  3. Eagle Investors v. Bank of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. Massey v. GriffithsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005
  5. Walworth State Bank v. Abbey Springs Condominium Association, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API