Legal Opinion

Eagle Investors v. Bank of America

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 1, 2014No. 14-15507UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Eagle Investors, a Nevada corporation, appeals from the district court’s order denying its motion for a preliminary injunction in this diversity action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). We vacate and remand.

The district court erred in concluding that Eagle Investors has not shown a likelihood of irreparable harm. Where, as here, a right of action arises under state law, state law must also govern the extent to which damages are available to vindicate that right. See Clausen v. M/V New Carissa, 339 F.3d 1049, 1064-65 (9th Cir.2003); Begay v. Kerr-McGee Corp., 682…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Clausen v. M/V New CarissaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Esther Lee Begay, Etc. v. The Kerr-Mcgee CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  4. Dixon v. ThatcherNevada Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Hamm v. Arrowcreek Homeowners' Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Allen v. CampbellDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API