Eagle Investors v. Bank of America
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Eagle Investors, a Nevada corporation, appeals from the district court’s order denying its motion for a preliminary injunction in this diversity action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). We vacate and remand.
The district court erred in concluding that Eagle Investors has not shown a likelihood of irreparable harm. Where, as here, a right of action arises under state law, state law must also govern the extent to which damages are available to vindicate that right. See Clausen v. M/V New Carissa, 339 F.3d 1049, 1064-65 (9th Cir.2003); Begay v. Kerr-McGee Corp., 682…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Clausen v. M/V New CarissaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Esther Lee Begay, Etc. v. The Kerr-Mcgee CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Dixon v. ThatcherNevada Supreme Court · 1987
- Hamm v. Arrowcreek Homeowners' Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Allen v. CampbellDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2021