Walworth State Bank v. Abbey Springs Condominium Association, Inc.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1DissentShirley S. Abrahamson, J.
¶ 31. (dissenting). I agree with the result reached by the court of appeals. The majority opinion asserts that Abbey Springs' policy violates "well-established foreclosure law."1 Asserting that something is "well-established" does not mean it is, in fact, "well-established." The majority opinion fails to prove its assertion.
¶ 32. Let's look at the facts. Abbey Springs, a condominium association, adopted a policy barring an owner of a condominium unit from using certain rec*93reational facilities if "regular monthly or special assessment [s]" are more than 90 days past due, unless the unpaid…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dorr v. Sacred Heart HospitalCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
- Highland Lakes Country Club & Community Ass'n v. FranzinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
- Gister v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- James Ex Rel. James v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- Apple Valley Gardens Ass'n v. MacHuttaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.