Legal Opinion
Garwick v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle Division
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided June 1, 2000No. 98-1947PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERNUS, Justice.
The appellant, Zacharia Garwick, claims his prior revocation under Iowa’s “zero-tolerance” law for minors should not be used to lengthen his current revocation, imposed for an operating-while-intoxicated violation. We disagree and affirm.
I. Background Facts and Proceedings.
In 1996, when Garwick was eighteen years old, his driver’s license was revoked for sixty days pursuant to Iowa Code section 321J.12(5) (Supp.1995). This revocation was based on Garwiek’s violation of Iowa Code section 321J.2A (Supp.1995), which prohibits a person under the age of twenty-one from driving…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. McCrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
- Soo Line Railroad v. Iowa Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
- State v. Guzman-JuarezSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
- Office of Consumer Advocate v. Iowa State Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
- Lockhart v. Cedar Rapids Community School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. WellsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
- Mason v. Schweizer Aircraft Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2002
- Bill Grunder's Sons Construction, Inc. v. GanzerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- State Ex Rel. Miller v. Midwest Pork, L.C.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2001
- Immaculate Conception Corp. v. Iowa Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.