Legal Opinion

Moser v. Van Winkle

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 12, 1990No. PR 85-109; CA A61268PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, P. J.

The former co-personal representative of decedent’s estate, Moser, appeals from an order surcharging him for the balance of the attorney fees and costs that the court allowed respondents against the estate. We affirm.

Moser and respondent Van Winkle, decedent’s widow, were appointed co-personal representatives of decedent’s estate. Van Winkle executed a power of attorney designating Moser to act on her behalf as co-personal representative. On October 22, 1987, the court entered a decree of final distribution for decedent’s estate. Moser filed a supplemental final account on June 22,1988.

On…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Samuel v. FrohnmayerOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Attaway, Inc. v. SafferCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  3. Matter of Estate of HayesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. Wadsworth v. Bank of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McNeely v. HiattCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API