Saczynski v. Saczynski
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVINE, J.
In this negligence action, the plaintiff, Michael Saczynski, Jr., appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the defendant, Michael Saczynski, Sr. The plaintiff claims on appeal that the court (1) improperly bifurcated the trial and (2) inadequately charged the jury. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The record includes the following facts and procedural histoiy. In March, 2003, the plaintiff lived in Bran-ford in a home he owned jointly with his daughter. Adjoining the property was a premises owned by the defendant, who is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Borkowski v. BorkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Swenson v. SawoskaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Reichhold Chemicals, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Reichhold Chemicals, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Estela v. Bristol Hospital, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Ibar v. Stratek Plastic Ltd.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Rockwell v. RockwellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017