Legal Opinion

Danisco U.S. Inc. v. Novozymes A/S

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 11, 2014No. 2013-1214PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

Danisco U.S. Inc. (“Danisco”) appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California dismissing Danisco’s declaratory judgment action against Novozymes A/S and Novozymes North America, Inc. (collectively “Novozymes”) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Danisco U.S. Inc. v. Novozymes A/S, No. 12-4502, 2013 WL 2351723 (N.D.Cal. Jan. 8, 2013) (unpublished). Because we conclude that the totality of the circumstances establishes a justiciable controversy, we reverse and remand.

BACKGROUND

Danisco and Novozymes compete to…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. U.S. Water Services, Inc. v. ChemTreat, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  2. ARRIS Group Inc. v. Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2017
  3. TransCardiac Therapeutics, Inc. v. YoganathanDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2014
  4. Apple Inc v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
  5. Applied Materials, Inc. v. Demaray LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API