Legal Opinion
Durham v. Durham
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided February 24, 2005No. 2004-340PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.
The plaintiff, Roland Durham, appeals an order of the Superior Court {Honran, J.) dismissing his petition for failure to state a claim and for lack of standing to sue. We affirm in part, vacate in part and remand.
The plaintiff’s petition alleged the following facts. The plaintiff and the three defendants, Gary Durham, Martha Styer and Peter Durham, are the sole shareholders of Sunset Ranch Camp, Inc., a New Hampshire corporation. The plaintiff owns 4,000 shares of the corporation’s stock and each defendant owns 2,000 shares. The corporation owns and operates the Sunset Ranch Camp in Orford.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Norman v. Nash Johnson & Sons' Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Landstrom v. ShaverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Barth v. BarthIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Thomas v. DicksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Schumacher v. SchumacherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Stephanie Keller v. Estate of Edward Stephen McRedmondTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
- Mathis v. ERA FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2009
- Kessler v. GleichSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- Vissa v. PaganoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Brining v. HayesVermont Superior Court · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.