Legal Opinion

Allstate Ins. Co. v. Mazorra

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 2, 1992No. 92-651PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

599 So.2d 739 (1992)

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner,

v.

Pelayo MAZORRA, Respondent.

No. 92-651.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 2, 1992.

Dean A. Mitchell, Miami, for petitioner.

Deutsch & Blumberg, James C. Blecke, Miami, for respondent.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

The county court denied Mazorra p.i.p. benefits because the covered expenses had been paid through workers' compensation, even though the comp. carrier had, in effect, been reimbursed by the claimant through the settlement and satisfaction of its lien on his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Deerfield Beach v. VaillantSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  2. Pardo v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  3. Comeau v. Safeco Ins. Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  4. South Carolina Ins. Co. v. ArnoldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. Fortune Ins. Co. v. McGheeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Omni Ins. Co. v. Special Care Clinic, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. PressleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. PressleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API