Legal Opinion

Village of Oakwood v. State Bank & Trust Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 22, 2007No. 06-3117PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COOK, Circuit Judge.

This case requires us to decide whether intervention by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) in a suit between nondiverse parties raising state law claims can create federal jurisdiction, even though it had not been a party in state court prior to removal. Holding that it cannot, we reverse.

I

The day after Oakwood Deposit Bank Company (Oakwood) was placed in federal receivership, the FDIC, as receiver, entered into a purchase and assumption agreement for State Bank and Trust (State Bank) to take over Oakwood’s insured deposits and some of its assets.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  5. Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Village of Oakwood v. State Bank and Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  2. Barnes v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  3. Rose v. Wayne County Airport AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016
  4. Janus v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 31Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  5. Village Of Oakwood v. State Bank And Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API