Legal Opinion

Village of Oakwood v. State Bank and Trust Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 22, 2008No. 07-4412PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge.

On February 1, 2002, the Oakwood Deposit Bank Company (Oakwood) failed. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) was immediately appointed as receiver. On the following day, the FDIC signed a Purchase and Assumption Agreement (P & A Agreement) with State Bank and Trust Company (State Bank) that caused the insured deposits of Oakwood to be transferred to State Bank. A group of partially uninsured depositors (collectively referred to as the Uninsured Depositors) filed a complaint in state court against State Bank in an attempt to recover the value…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Kircher v. Putnam Funds TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. American Nat. Ins. Co. v. FDICCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
  2. Peggy Blizzard v. Marion Technical CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  3. Bank of New York v. First Millennium, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  4. Acosta-Ramirez v. Banco Popular de Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  5. Benson v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API