Legal Opinion

C & H TAXI CO. v. Richardson

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1995No. 22251PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This case is before this Court upon an appeal by C & H Taxi Company (hereinafter “C & H”) from the final order of the Circuit Court of Kanawha County, entered on January 26, 1994. Pursuant to that order, the circuit court affirmed the May 22, 1991, decision and order of the Commissioner of the West Virginia Workers’ Compensation Fund that the relationship between C & H and its taxicab drivers is that of employer-employee for workers’ compensation purposes and that, accordingly, C & H is required to pay workers’ compensation premiums for the benefit of those drivers. For the reasons stated…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Shepherdstown Volunteer Fire Dept. v. State Ex Rel. State Human Rights CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. McCorkleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. StuartWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. HonakerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Adkins v. GatsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  2. In re Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2008
  3. Zirkle v. WinklerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. C&H Company v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
  5. In Re Fedex Ground Package System, Inc., Employment Practices LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API