Legal Opinion
C&H Company v. Richardson
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided October 27, 2003No. 00-2388UnpublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
C & H Company (C & H) appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Andrew N. Richardson, John H. Kozak, John E. Burdette II, and William F. Vieweg on C & H’s claims under the West Virginia Constitution and 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1983 and 1985(3) (West 2003) alleging disparate treatment in the application of certain West Virginia workers’ compensation statutes. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
I
This case involves the application of regulations governing the payment of workers’ compensation premiums for taxicab drivers in West Virginia. Pursuant to W. Va.Code §…
3Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by9 opinions
- Allah v. EngelkeDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2022
- Amilcar Joshua Quintana v. Allen, et al.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2026
- Bartol v. ArbogastDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- Blankenship v. TrumpDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2023
- Hayes v. Town of DaltonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.