Loewe v. California State Federation of Labor
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California
In Equity. On motion for preliminary injunction. Bill of complaint by D. E. Loewe & Co., of Danbury, Conn., against the California State Federation of Labor and others. On order to show cause why a temporary injunction should not issue, restraining the defendants from boycotting complainants’ business.
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, Circuit Judge.
This is an order to show cause why an injunction pendente lite, should not issue, restraining the defendants from in any manner conspiring together to destroy the trade and business of complainants; from boycotting the complainants’ business or the product of their factory; from publishing or otherwise circulating statements or representations calling the attention of complainants’ customers or of dealers or of tradesmen or of the public to any boycott or strike against the complainants; from threatening or intimidating the customers of complainants *72or the public or…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Andrew J. Aikens v. State of WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Beck v. Railway Teamsters' Protective UnionMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Arthur v. OakesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894
- State v. StewartSupreme Court of Vermont · 1887
- State v. GliddenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1887
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Iron Molders' Union No. 125 of Milwaukee v. Allischalmers Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1908
- In Re WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Allis-Chalmers Co. v. Iron Molders' Union No. 125U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1906
- Spaulding v. EvensonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Washington · 1906
- National Life Insurance Co. of the United States v. MyersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.