State v. Glidden
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Information for a conspiracy, in the Superior Court in New Haven County. The defendants were Benjamin F. Glidden, David McNamara, Thomas Mulcahy and Frederick Busche. The information contained six counts.
Read the full summary
Information for a conspiracy, in the Superior Court in New Haven County. The defendants were Benjamin F. Glidden, David McNamara, Thomas Mulcahy and Frederick Busche. The information contained six counts. The first count charged the object of the conspiracy to have been (1) to compel the Carrington Publishing Company, a corporation and the publishers of a newspaper, against its will to discharge its workmen, and to employ such persons as the defendants and their associates should name ; and (2) to injure and oppress the workmen then in the employ of the corporation, by depriving them of…
1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.
This is an information for a conspiracy. The defendants demurred to the information; their demurrer was overruled. They then pleaded not guilty ;• the verdict was guilty as to all but one of the defendants; the defendants convicted appealed. The appeal raises a question as to the sufficiency of the information, and also some questions of evidence.
Is an offense sufficiently charged in the information ? There are six counts. The verdict was taken separately as to each defendant on each count. The three defendants who were convicted were found guilty on all the counts.
[The judge here states the…
2Cited by54 opinions
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State ex rel. Durner v. HueginWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Pickett v. WalshMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Toledo, A. A. & N. M. Ry. Co. v. Pennsylvania Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1893
- Plant v. WoodsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.