Legal Opinion
Holland v. Woodhaven Building & Development, Inc.
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided January 30, 1997No. 362, Sept. Term, 1996PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EYLER, Judge.
The primary issue addressed on this appeal is whether an amendment to the Town of Hampstead Code should be applied retroactively to confer standing on appellants to appeal .a zoning decision to the Hampstead Board of Zoning Appeals. We hold that retroactive application of the zoning amendment is not appropriate under the facts of this case and affirm the Board of Zoning Appeals’ dismissal of appellants’ appeal.
Facts
On August 29, 1994, the Town of Hampstead Planning & Zoning Commission (Commission) granted final approval to Woodhaven Building & Development, Inc., appellee, for a…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bulluck v. Pelham Wood ApartmentsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Bryniarski v. Montgomery County Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Janda v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- State Commission on Human Relations v. Amecom Division of Litton Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Powell v. Calvert CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- 120 West Fayette Street, LLLP v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Becker v. Anne Arundel CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Layton v. Howard County Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Ray v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.