Legal Opinion

Carlson v. Wald

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 1, 1984No. Civ. 69981PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SAETA, J. *

This appeal arises from a fight between two coworkers, Harry Carlson and Arnold Wald. In this action, Carlson sued Wald for assault and battery and Wald cross-complained in kind. Mrs. Wald sued Carlson in a separate lawsuit, now consolidated with her husband’s action, for loss of consortium resulting from the same fight. The Walds appeal from the trial court’s summary judgments adjudicating that there was no merit in Wald’s cross-complaint or Mrs. Wald’s complaint. The summary judgments were grounded on Carlson’s arguments that the Walds were bound under res judicata by a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  2. French v. RishellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Mathews v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Marriott v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Iverson v. Atlas Pacific EngineeringCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ledger v. TippittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. Mealy v. B-Mobile, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Kruger v. United Airlines, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2007
  4. Ledger v. TippittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API