State v. Brooks
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment committing him to the jurisdiction of the Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB) for a term of 31 years. That term represented the total of six consecutive five-year terms and one consecutive one-year term for crimes for which defendant was found guilty except for insanity. Defendant argues that, under ORS 161.327(1), the trial court erred in “stacking” his terms of commitment and, particularly, that his commitment could not exceed a total of five years, the “maximum sentence provided by statute” for any one of the felonies for which he was found guilty…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. WaterhouseOregon Supreme Court · 1957
- State v. RacicotCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Young v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- State v. Ferman-VelascoOregon Supreme Court · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Godfrey v. Fred Meyer StoresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. LeakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Kerr v. BradburyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- State v. RettmannCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. AustinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.