J. R. Watkins Medicine Co. v. Hargett
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.
The J. R. Watkins Medicine Company brought this joint action against Pace, Hargett, and I-Iill on a contract the purpose of which was to secure to plaintiff the price of medicines furnished and to be furnished to Pace for resale by him. We are' clear to the conclusion that by the instrument declared on Hargett and Hill became, guarantors for Pace, and that the demurrer for misjoinder was properly sustained. J. W. Watkins Med. Co. v. Lovelady, 186 Ala. 414, 65 South. 52. The complaint was then amended, and the cause proceeded against Hargett and Hill.
In special plea 9 defendants Hargett and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Page v. . KrekeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Ex parte Goldberg & LewisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Marks v. First National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- White Sewing Machine Co. v. SaxonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- J. W. Watkins Med. Co. v. LoveladySupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- J. R. Watkins Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Sager v. W .T. Rawleigh Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1929
- Crumrine v. DizdarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Cresap v. Furst ThomasMississippi Supreme Court · 1925
- Waldrep v. NosratSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.