Legal Opinion

Littlefield v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 12, 1982No. Civ. 66300PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KINGSLEY, J.

By petition for mandate filed in this court September 3, 1982, petitioners seek to vacate the trial court’s rulings of August 23 and 24, 1982, which overrule petitioner Bianchi’s claim of attorney/client privilege and clergyman/penitent privilege. The challenged orders require prosecution witness Bianchi to testify on cross-examination as to the content of confidential conversations between him and his defense counsel, petitioner Los Angeles County Public Defender, concerning the “Hillside Strangler” murders and compel the public defender to disclose to defendant Buono’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. People v. MeredithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Lohman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. People v. KorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. People v. FloresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. People v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  3. L.A. Cnty. Bd. of Supervisors v. Superior Court of L.A. Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Brookings v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  5. Commonwealth v. GoldmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API