Legal Opinion

People v. Meredith

California Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1981No. Crim. 21291PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TOBRINER, J.

Defendants Frank Earl Scott and Michael Meredith appeal from convictions for the first degree murder and first degree robbery of David Wade. Meredith’s conviction rests on eyewitness testimony that he shot and killed Wade. Scott’s conviction, however, depends on the theory that Scott conspired with Meredith and a third defendant, Jacqueline Otis, to bring about the killing and robbery. To support the theory of conspiracy the prosecution sought to show the place where the victim’s wallet was found, and, in the course of the case this piece of evidence became crucial. The…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. People v. JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. People v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. People v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. BarnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. People v. BoldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. People v. CollieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  5. People v. AlexanderCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API