Prudoehl v. Randall
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in tbe district court for Winona county upon a cropping contract under which plaintiff, as tenant, surrendered possession upon notice to vacate because of a sale of the premises. The first cause of action was for $187 for one half of the hay; the second cause of action was for $100 for the conversion of eight cords of fire wood felled on the premises; the third cause of action was for $7.50 pasture money received.
Read the full summary
Action in tbe district court for Winona county upon a cropping contract under which plaintiff, as tenant, surrendered possession upon notice to vacate because of a sale of the premises. The first cause of action was for $187 for one half of the hay; the second cause of action was for $100 for the conversion of eight cords of fire wood felled on the premises; the third cause of action was for $7.50 pasture money received. The prayer was for an accounting by defendant of one balf share in all grains, vegetables, hay, and produce raised during the season of 1907 and to recover the value thereof.…
1Opinion of the CourtJaggaed, J.
Plaintiff leased defendant’s farm. The contract which the parties signed was made by filling out a current blank form of agreement in common use. The plaintiff entered into possession of the farm and operated it for a period of about two years. During the second summer defendant sold the farm, gave plaintiff the notice provided for in the contract, paid him $100 stipulated for in case of a sale, and demanded that he vacate on the following September 1, as agreed. Plaintiff did not, however, vacate until some time about the middle of October following. He brought this action to recover damages…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lumber Co. v. Corey.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Abel v. AlexanderIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- McNeal v. RiderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Strangeway v. EisenmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Anderson v. ListonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pryor v. International Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923