Legal Opinion
Hare & Chase, Inc. v. National Surety Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 29, 1932No. 399PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWAN, Circuit Judge.
The 'plaintiff’s appeal presents a single question of law, namely, the correctness of' the District Court’s ruling that the plaintiff' is estopped from claiming that losses arising; from taxicab obligations acquired by Hare & Chase, Inc., from the General Finance Corporation are within the coverage of the insurance contract in suit. This ruling is based' upon findings of fact respecting the plaintiff’s representations and silence while the contract was being negotiated, and such findings are not now challenged. Since the facts appear in detail in the thorough and scholarly…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Stipcich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Penn Mut. Life Ins. v. Mechanics' Savings Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
- Mallory v. . the Travelers' Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Rawls v. . American Mutual Life Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- Clark v. President of the Manufacturers' InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Unigard Security Insurance Company, Inc., Successor to Unigard Mutual Insurance Company, Inc. v. North River Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Christiania General Insurance Corporation of New York v. Great American Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Donald Vella v. The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States and the Equitable Group and Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Unigard Security Insurance v. North River InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Christiana General Insurance v. Great American InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.