State v. King
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.
— The principal issue in this case is whether the Indeterminate Sentence Review Board properly based an exceptional minimum sentence partly upon disclosures the defendant made while undergoing court-ordered sexual psychopathy treatment. We affirm the Court of Appeals, which held that use of the defendant’s disclosures did not offend the Fifth Amendment.
Facts
In July of 1981, the King County prosecutor charged Edward King with four counts of first degree rape while armed with a deadly weapon. The parties reached a plea agreement whereby King would plead guilty to two counts of first degree rape…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. RilesWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. CrossWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. CrossWashington Supreme Court · 2006
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.