Legal Opinion

Boehler v. Boehler

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lebanon County

Decided November 25, 2014No. 2006-20469Published

1Opinion of the Court

CHARLES, J.,

— When the whims of children are frequently indulged, they will quickly get the message that “what I want” is most important. When a child’s pique is permitted to prevail over adult rules, the child will be emboldened to employ drama as a tactic to get “what I want.” When children are permitted to stubbornly disobey court-ordered custody schedules, the message conveyed is that “what I want” trumps even the rule of law. Given the above — which we classify as axiomatic to the point of being self-evident — it is imperative that parents do everything possible to prevent children from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brocker v. BrockerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. CR by Dunn v. the TravelersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Royal Bank of Pennsylvania v. SeligSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Warmkessel v. HeffnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. G.A. v. D.L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API