Boehler v. Boehler
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lebanon County
1Opinion of the Court
CHARLES, J.,
— When the whims of children are frequently indulged, they will quickly get the message that “what I want” is most important. When a child’s pique is permitted to prevail over adult rules, the child will be emboldened to employ drama as a tactic to get “what I want.” When children are permitted to stubbornly disobey court-ordered custody schedules, the message conveyed is that “what I want” trumps even the rule of law. Given the above — which we classify as axiomatic to the point of being self-evident — it is imperative that parents do everything possible to prevent children from…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brocker v. BrockerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- CR by Dunn v. the TravelersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Royal Bank of Pennsylvania v. SeligSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Warmkessel v. HeffnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- G.A. v. D.L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013