Legal Opinion

United States v. Hall

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 12, 1956PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.

Both defendants in this action are under indictment and awaiting trial on a bribery charge. By this motion, defendant Wong Suey Loon seeks an opportunity to examine before trial two statements — one signed, the other unsigned — which he made to government agents shortly after his arrest.1 He contends that he is entitled to this relief under either Rule 16 or Rule 17(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A. He thus raises the question of the scope of both these rules, a question upon which judicial opinion is divided.

Rule 16 is the sole…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bowman Dairy Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Matter of DoyleNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. United States v. IoziaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
  4. Shores v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
  5. United States v. PeltzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1962
  2. United States v. BentvenaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
  3. United States v. Louie Gim Hall and Wong Suey LoonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  4. United States v. WortmanDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1960
  5. United States v. BensonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API