Pierre-Canel v. Am. Airlines
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
Cindy K. Jorgenson, United States District Judge
Pending before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 63) filed by Defendant American Airlines, Inc. ("American"). Plaintiffs Iddy M. Pierre-Canel ("Pierre-Canel") and Emmanuel J. Simeus ("Simeus") (collectively, "Plaintiffs") have filed a response (Doc. 65) and American has filed a reply (Doc. 67). Oral argument has been requested. However, the issues are fully presented in the briefs and the Court finds it would not be assisted by oral argument. The Court declines to schedule this matter for oral argument. LRCiv 7.2(f).
I. Factual…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Fraser v. GoodaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Unknown Party v. Arizona Board of RegentsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019