Legal Opinion

Bowler v. Bowler

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1965PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohn H. Pennock, J.

This is a motion by the defendant for a judgment dismissing the complaint on the grounds that the plaintiff is collaterally estopped from bringing this action and upon the further ground the complaint fails to state a cause of action. The motion was made pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd. [a], pars. 5, 7).

The codefendants, Alfred T. Bowler and Pearl Dexter Bowler, were married on November 24,1961. Prior thereto the plaintiff was married to the codefendant, Alfred T. Bowler, and she secured a judgment of divorce by default on October 21, 1961, and was awarded $25 a week alimony. He failed to make…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. American Surety Co. v. ConnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Enthoven v. EnthovenNew York Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Enthoven v. EnthovenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  4. Leitman v. LeitmanNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Matthews v. SchusheimNew York Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Farino v. FarinoNew York Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Rand v. RandNew York Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Leibowits v. LeibowitsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Murphy v. MurphyNew York Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API