Legal Opinion

Farino v. Farino

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1982PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Arthur D. Spatt, J.

BACKGROUND

By deed dated April 16,1979, defendant Joseph J. Farino (Joseph) transferred to his mother, codefendant Mary Farino (Mary), without consideration, title to the single-family *375dwelling known as premises No. 1841 Kent Street, West-bury, New York.

By summons and complaint dated March 25,1981, plaintiff, who is the former wife of Joseph, commenced this action seeking a judgment, pursuant to section 278 of the Debtor and Creditor Law vacating and setting aside the afore-mentioned conveyance as “fraudulent”. Specifically, the complaint alleges, in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Burns v. . McCormickNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. De West Realty Corp. v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  3. Enthoven v. EnthovenNew York Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Rush v. RushAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
  5. Matter of Bailey v. BaileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1943

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Atlanta Shipping Corp., Inc. v. Chemical BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  2. Elgin Sweeper Co. v. Melson Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1995
  3. Apple Bank for Savings v. ContaratosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Interpool Ltd. v. PattersonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  5. St. Teresa's Nursing Home v. VuksanovichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API