Legal Opinion

United States v. Osorio

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided February 15, 1990No. Cr-87-147-01-GPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HIRAM H. WARD, Senior District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendant’s pro se Motion to Credit Time in Custody, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3568.1 Finding that the controlling statute does not entitle defendant to a credit for time during which he was free on bond, the Court will deny defendant’s motion.

The statute regarding credit for time in custody provides, in part, as follows:

The sentence of imprisonment of any person convicted of an offense shall commence to run from the date on which such person is received at the penitentiary, reformatory, or jail for service of such…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hensley v. Municipal Court, San Jose-Milpitas Judicial Dist., Santa Clara Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Polakoff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. United States v. Ruben Morales RoblesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  4. Cochran v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  5. Chua Han Mow v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. RoucoDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API