Legal Opinion
Thornton v. T & W Tire, L.P.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided January 20, 2006No. CIV-05-0909-FPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
FRIOT, District Judge.
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, filed November 23, 2005 is before the court. (Doc. no. 19.) Plaintiffs have responded, and the motion is ready for determination.
Standards
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c), summary judgment shall be granted if the record shows that “there is no genuine issue as to. any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” The moving party has the burden of showing the absence of a genuine issue of material fact. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 325, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Edward R. POSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SKYLINE CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Brickner v. GoodenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re KimballUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2016