Legal Opinion

In re Kimball

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided December 13, 2016No. Case No. 16-11996-JDLPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DETERMINING APPLICABLE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS TO CLAIM AND RESCHEDULING HEARING

Janice D. Loyd, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

This matter is before the Court on. Debtors’ Objection to Proof of Claim of Alleged Priority Secured Creditor Tambra Lynn Kimball (“Objection”) [Doc. 27] and the Response to Objection of Creditor Tambra Lynn Kimball (“Tambra”) (“Response”) [Doc. 29]. The basis of Debtor’s Objection is that the claim for back child support of Tambra, Debtor Robert B Kim-ball’s (“Robert”) ex-wife, is barred by the statute of limitations. In her Response, Tambra asserts that the statute of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Sun Oil Co. v. WortmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. In Re Teleglobe Communications Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  5. In Re Herbert L. HOLM, Debtor. Alan WRIGHT, Creditor-Appellee, v. Herbert L. HOLM, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Born v. Progrexion TeleservicesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2020
  2. Dotson v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance AgencyDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API