Legal Opinion

Falls v. Scott

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 12, 1991No. 65,189PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court wás delivered by

Lockett, J.:

This is a personal injury negligence action. Berlin Falls, while on his property, was severely injured when a “brush hog” mowing machine being operated on adjacent property threw a piece of wire that struck him in the face and eyes. Falls sued Rosemary Scott, the landowner, and Harry Ohmie, the mowing machine operator, for Falls’ injuries resulting from their alleged negligence. Although the jury returned a verdict for Falls, he appeals a number of adverse trial court rulings, claiming the trial court erred in: (1) not allowing plaintiffs…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Slaymaker v. Westgate State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  2. Patterson v. BrouhardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  3. Hoffman v. HaugSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  4. Plains Transport of Kansas, Inc. v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  5. Williams v. Amoco Production Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Mitzner Ex Rel. Bishop v. State, Kansas Department of Social & Rehabilitation ServicesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  2. Pullen v. WestSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  3. State v. CooperwoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  4. McCubbin Ex Rel. McCubbin v. WalkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  5. Craig v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2014

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API