Ernest W. Hahn, Inc. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NARES, J.
Petitioner Ernest W. Hahn, Inc., doing business as The Hahn Company, and Horton Plaza Associates (collectively Hahn) seek a peremp tory writ of mandamus to compel the court to vacate its order denying Hahn’s demurrer to Robert A. Martin (Martin) and Clifton J. Rogers’s (Rogers) cause of action for strict liability. Because we conclude a strict liability theory is inapplicable to the facts of this case, we grant the petition.
Factual and Procedural Background
According to the first amended complaint, Martin and Rogers sustained personal injuries while they were seated at a table…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
- J'Aire Corp. v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Goodenough v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Becker v. IRM Corp.California Supreme Court · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- County of Monterey v. Blue Cross of CaliforniaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
- Esquevel v. Costco Wholesale CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020