American Federation of Government Employees v. Vilsack
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
2Per curiam
The court considered this appeal on the record and the briefs of the parties. See D.C. Cir. R. 34(j). The panel has accorded the issues full consideration and has determined that they do not warrant a published opinion. See D.C. Cir. R. 36(d). It is hereby
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Plaintiffs-Appellants, the American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, and AFGE officer Charles Painter (collectively, AFGE) challenge a final rule of the Department of Agriculture that changes the way the Department’s Food Safety Inspection Service…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Food & Water Watch, Inc. v. Thomas VilsackCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- American Federation of Government Employees, Afl-Cio v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
4Cited by1 opinion
- Consumers for Auto Reliability and Safety v. Federal Trade CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021