Jeremy Fuel & Grain Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.
The plaintiffs, pursuant to our statute, made application to this court for a writ of review against the Public Utilities Commission of Utah, hereinafter called Commission. The writ was duly issued, and in obedience thereto the Commission has certified to this court a complete transcript of the proceedings had before it in the proceeding hereinafter referred to.
It appears from the transcript aforesaid that the plaintiffs *394are coal dealers in Salt Lake City, Utah, and as such commenced a proceeding before the Commission against the Denver & R. G-. R. R. Co., in which, stating it in the language…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Salt Lake City v. Utah Light & Traction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1918
- Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
- Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Public Service CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1922
3Cited by12 opinions
- Utah Department of Business Regulation, Division of Public Utilities v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- Denver & R. G. W. R. Co. v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1940
- Utah Department of Business Regulation v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1986
- Common Cause of Utah v. Utah Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1979
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.