Legal Opinion

Jeremy Fuel & Grain Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1924No. 3909PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

The plaintiffs, pursuant to our statute, made application to this court for a writ of review against the Public Utilities Commission of Utah, hereinafter called Commission. The writ was duly issued, and in obedience thereto the Commission has certified to this court a complete transcript of the proceedings had before it in the proceeding hereinafter referred to.

It appears from the transcript aforesaid that the plaintiffs *394are coal dealers in Salt Lake City, Utah, and as such commenced a proceeding before the Commission against the Denver & R. G-. R. R. Co., in which, stating it in the language…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Salt Lake City v. Utah Light & Traction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  3. Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Public Service CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Utah Department of Business Regulation, Division of Public Utilities v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Denver & R. G. W. R. Co. v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Utah Department of Business Regulation v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Common Cause of Utah v. Utah Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Southern Pacific Co. v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API