Common Cause of Utah v. Utah Public Service Commission
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKETT, Chief Justice:
In this action the parties seek a determination as to the extent that our “Open and Public Meetings Act” 1 requires the defendant Public Service Commission to conduct its affairs in sessions open to the public.
The portions of the Act pertinent to that problem are Section 52-4-1 which states that:
In enacting this chapter, the legislature finds and declares that the state, its agencies and political subdivisions exist to aid in the conduct of the people’s business. It is the intent of the law that their actions be taken openly and that their deliberations be conducted…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mulcahy v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1941
- School District No. 9 v. District Boundary Board Ex Rel. Fremont CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1960
- Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1945
- Wycoff Company v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1962
- Jordan v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Dairy Product Services, Inc. v. City of WellsvilleUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- Kearns-Tribune Corp. v. Salt Lake County CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2001
- Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Ward v. Richfield CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
- Andrews v. Utah Board of PardonsUtah Supreme Court · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.