Tinicum Township v. Nowicki
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION BY
Judge LEAVITT.
Respectfully, I dissent. The trial court held that the mulching operation of Landowners 1 was manufacturing and, as such, belonged only in the Township’s Manufacturing District. Because Landowners’ mulching operation was being conducted on property located on the site of a quarry in the Extraction District of Tinicum Township, the trial court upheld the Township’s zoning violation. I would reverse. Landowners are not engaged in manufacturing. Our Supreme Court has held, definitively, that the production of mulch is an agricultural operation and not…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gaspari v. Muhlenberg Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Stoltzfus v. Zoning Hearing Board of Eden TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Clout, Inc. v. Clinton County Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Header v. Schuylkill County Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Wellington Farms, Inc. v. Township of Silver SpringCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996