Legal Opinion
Stoltzfus v. Zoning Hearing Board of Eden Township
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 7, 2007PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Senior Judge McCLOSKEY.
Levi K. Stoltzfus (Landowner) appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County (trial court), affirming a decision of the Zoning Hearing Board of Eden Township (Board) which concluded that Landowner’s log processing business did not constitute a forestry use. We affirm.
Landowner’s property is located at 560 Furnace Road, Quarryville, Pennsylvania. It is located entirely within Eden Township’s agricultural zone and includes a sixty acre farm, a home, several sheds and a barn.
The property contains a total of sixty-seven acres. In 1996,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re Appeal of ThompsonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- In Re Appeal of Realen Valley Forge Greenes AssociatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Caco Three, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors of Huntington TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- In Re ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
3Cited by8 opinions
- Tinicum Township v. NowickiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Hoffman Mining Co., Inc. v. ZONING HEARING BD. OF ADAMS TOWNSHIPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Battersea Ventures, L.P. v. Phila. ZBA and the City of Phila., UCFP LLCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Conshohocken Borough v. Conshohocken Borough ZHB ~ Appeal of: K.J. Waller & L. RhodesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- In re Appeal of SW Land Associates, LLC, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.