Legal Opinion

Gaspari v. Muhlenberg Township Board of Adjustment

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 17, 1958No. Appeal, No. 98PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Musmanno,

Prior to recent years, commercially grown mushrooms obtained most of their substance, but fortunately, not their flavor, from horse manure. Professor Leon Bussell Kneebone of the Pennsylvania State University, who has charge of the Mushroom Experimental Station at that university, testified in this case: “. . . The Mushroom is a plant but it is not a plant like a green plant which needs only sun, light, water, carbon dioxide from the air; the mushroom would never *9be able to grow. Tbe mushroom must be fed more like an animal is fed because it cannot make its own…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rieck-McJunkin Dairy Co. v. Pittsburgh School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Commonwealth v. Lowry-Rodgers Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Commonwealth v. McCrady-rodgers Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Building Inspector of BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
  2. Donovan v. Frezzo Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  3. Vlasic Farms Inc. v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Saunders v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  5. Tinicum Township v. NowickiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API